caudium-devel AT caudium.net
Caudium Developer mailing list.

Re: [caudium-devel] Re: Conference


chronological Thread 
  • From: "H. William Welliver III" <hww3 AT riverweb.com>
  • To: pike-devel AT lists.lysator.liu.se, caudium-devel AT caudium.net
  • Subject: Re: [caudium-devel] Re: Conference
  • Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 11:29:34 -0400 (EDT)

Just my 2 cents:

I'm not necessarily convinced that more time equates to more getting done. My observation was that if you had a 7 day conference, folks would show up for a few days and that you'd end up having "quorum" for only a brief period. The reality is that having 5 days versus 3 days isn't going to mean the difference between a release or not.

while I agree that the focus of our meetings has tended not to cater to end users, i think that's more a result of the audience.

one could also make the argument that we might not be drawing a larger crowd for any of the following reasons (not necessarily inclusive):

- lack of advance notice on dates and locations
- length of time: most folks have jobs that prevent them from taking a
    whole week just for something like this
- perception of a too-highly technical crowd

My preference would be for more "meetings" of shorter duration. That way, there are more likely to be "hits" for people's schedules. I understand that getting a large proportion of the core development team is a goal, but that's more a matter of coordination than anything.

It's less the case for people like me, but folks in europe are blessed with inexpensive air travel that makes things like twice yearly, in-person meetings of a day or two possible for a large number of our audience.

Also, I'm not opposed to making the trip to Sweden. I've never been, and I hear it's lovely :)

Bill

the last two conferences were more like 5 days. and i'd like to spend
more time actually working on code and a 7.8 release.
like an extended international version of that last meeting over
kladdkaka.

that's not for everyone of course, but it's not like we are drawing a
crowd, so we might as well do things to move pike forward instead of
trying to attract a lot of pike users.
(not that i am against attracting pike users, only suggesting that the
conference might not necesarily be the venue for it)



Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.10.

§