- From: bertrand.lupart AT linkeo.com (Bertrand LUPART)
- To: caudium-general AT caudium.net
- Subject: [caudium-general] Re: anyone using snapshots?
- Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 23:03:34 +0200
- Organization: Linkeo.com
>
> My last argument would be that's it's way easier for testing: snapshot
>
> 2008XXYY is more specific than "get a cvs/svn snapshot number 42 or from
>
> yesterdayy night". It's also easier to get a revision from the past.
>
>
>
> I hope i've made my point :)
>
>
Yep. I definitely see the benefits to having snapshots. I'd like to make
>
sure that we very clearly identify them for download and use as such (ie,
>
that the version may be something like 1.4.20080612-SNAPSHOT.
Let's keep even numbers for releases and odd for others:
1.4.14-RELEASE
1.4.15-YYYYMMDD-SNAPSHOT
1.4.16-RELEASE
1.4.17-YYYYMMDD-SNAPSHOT
...
>
Also, some reading homework for everyone:
>
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous_Integration
Currently reading.
--
Bertrand LUPART
http://bertrand.gotpike.org/
- [caudium-general] Re: Re: Re: anyone using snapshots?, (continued)
[caudium-general] Re: anyone using snapshots?, Bertrand LUPART, 06/12/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.